skip navigation
header image

Sex harassment redefined....

By Emma Bramley, Solicitor
Thursday 8th May 2008

The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (Amendment) Regulations (SI 2008/656) came into force on 6 April 2008. This makes changes to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 by bringing in an amended definition of harassment, which removes any element of causation and requires only that the harassment be related to the sex of the victim or any other person.

This new definition of sex harassment has had lawyers scratching their heads as to possible situations in which this definition might apply… as what is the difference between harassment ‘on the ground of’ sex as compared to ‘relating to’ a person’s sex?

The motivation of the Regulations was to eliminate the issue of causation regarding sexual harassment.  The phrase “on the ground of” required the conduct to be motivated by the victim’s sex whereas the phrase “related to” is associative, which can cover a wider range of conduct.  

The example found is this: Where male colleagues dislikes a female colleague and decides to put office equipment on a high shelf to make it hard for her to reach, the former definition may not apply (because, say, the man is acting out of dislike of the woman and not because she is a woman) but the new definition would apply because the conduct of putting equipment on a high shelf relates to sex because woman are, on average, shorter than men. 

Another example would be where a male manager follows a woman into the ladies toilets and harasses her. If he followed her into the toilets to shout at her this is likely to be conduct ‘relating to sex’ (as he has gone into the ladies toilet) but might not be conduct ‘on grounds of sex’ (as you would have to look at whether the reason he was shouting at her was to do with her sex !).

Its fair to say that it is still fairly confusing : but the bottom line has to be don’t tolerate any kind of harassment (whether on the grounds of or relating to a person’s sex) as it opens you up to a risk of a complicated and expensive claim!

For more detailed guidance please contact Emma Bramley of the Employment Team at Follett Stock on 01872 241700.

 

Related Articles

   
  Baldness, by itself, is not a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act
  Cornish goodies...or baddies!?
  Depressed at work?
  Strike and you're out!
  Tax Reminder
  Corporate Manslaughter
  HIPS latest developments affecting new builds
  Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
  Proposed changes to maternity leave benefits
  £100 Billion Sick Note Culture
  First case involving discrimination against the young
   
 



View profile for Verity Slater Verity Slater    
Associate Partner & Head of Employment
DDI: 01872 247284
email address   Email Verity

View profile for Graham Groves Graham Groves    
Solicitor
DDI: 01872 245994
email address   Email Graham

View profile for Emma Bramley Emma Bramley    
Solicitor
DDI: 01872 245991
email address   Email Emma

View profile for Claire Knowles Claire Knowles    
Employment Services Facilitator
DDI: 01872 245965
email address   Email Claire

View profile for Aimee Morgan Aimee Morgan    
Trainee Solicitor
DDI: 01872 245171
email address   Email Aimee

For all enquiries about Employment Law related issues, please contact any member of our specialist team on 01872 241700 for further information or to arrange an appointment.
 




Truro Business Park, Truro, Cornwall TR4 9NH T: 01872 241700
© Follett Stock Solicitors. All rights reserved.

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)




[smaller] Change text size [larger]